I lifted this article from a friend (LS)'s FB page.
“Adoption is Not the Same as Having a Child of Your Own”
Posted by Dawn Davenport - May 18th, 2010 - 42 Comments

The statement that adoption is not the same as having a child of your own is both remarkably accurate and remarkably wrong. The first part—“not the same as”—is quite true. Adoption and giving birth are two very different ways of creating your family. Just as New York City and Paris are two different vacation destinations, or chocolate and vanilla are two different flavors of ice cream.

We seem to focus so readily on what adoptive parent miss by not giving birth that we overlook what parents by birth miss by not adopting. As a mother by birth and adoption, I have often felt a little sorry for people who haven’t adopted. They have missed so much.
If you haven’t adopted you haven’t felt the breath holding excitement of “getting the call” announcing that a birth mother has chosen you (domestic adoption) or that a child has been referred (international adoption). You’ve missed the wonder of meeting a fully formed human being that is your child, complete with all the unspoken possibilities of that relationship. Oh, and you’ll never have the pins and needles sensation of waiting to travel to pick up your child whether you’re driving across town or flying across an ocean—making lists, packing and unpacking, giggling at absolutely nothing, and worrying over absolutely everything.

Adoption can make the everyday seem miraculous. The moment when this child that you met only a few months or even weeks before seeks you, and only you, out of the crowd with her eyes. The moment when you realize that your small developmentally delayed child is now a robust into-everything preschooler, and the quiet pride you feel knowing that but for you, these gains may not have happened. The contentment in knowing that you took a risk and it paid off. A feeling of satisfaction unique to adoptive parents when we look around our Thanksgiving table and realize that we are a family created by choice and love.
Yes Marie, you’re so right. Creating a family by adoption is not the same as creating a family by birth. You couldn’t be more wrong, however, about the “child of your own” part.
I’m not exactly sure what Marie and others meant by “a child of your own”, but it implies a desire for a child who looks and acts like you. A child you conceive will share half your DNA, and while it’s true that appearance and certain characteristics are influenced by genetics, what’s most interesting from research, as well as from my personal experience, is how little of our traits, personality, and intelligence are controlled exclusively by our genes. (I highly recommend the Dec. 9, 2009 Creating a Family show we did on Nature vs. Nurture).

I suspect that those who made the comments are seeking a feeling of “this child is mine”. But what they are missing is that this feeling comes through the acts of parenting. Sure, giving birth is one act, and a big darn act at that, but parenting is made up of thousands of acts each day, and it is the sum total of all these acts of claiming that creates this feeling of “owness”. Biology has little to do with it, unless you make it.
I worry a little when I hear the word “own” used in relation to our children. I am sure that Marie would assure me that she wasn’t using “own” in the possessive sense, but I wonder. I know that before I had children, and even when my children were young, I thought of them as an extension of myself. It was only after my children grew older that I completely grasped the concept that I am only along for a short part of the ride. I can influence and guide, but never own. Don’t worry, I’m not going to go all Kahlil Gibran on you, but your kids are never really yours regardless how they join your family.

No comments:
Post a Comment